TIAB - The Googol - Two Minute Clip !! - IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND !!
The Big Bang explained once and for all !! - By Mick Bartram - micktbart@yahoo.co.uk - 01493 748397 - 18\05\2024
By Mick Bartram - Former CSO and Computer Technician of IN-AP Systems
The smaller the divisor the bigger the quotient
My main conjecture is that all you need is a void and a single particle to make a Universe !!, , ,,The ZERO void = ZERO Matter\Energy hence ZERO SPACE-TIME, and that becomes the infinitesimally small divisor of the particle, so there may of been no SPACE \ place where it happened and no TIME when it happened , but QED it did happen, so i believe that the void was not quite ZERO, allowing there to be some form of SPACE-TIME, I do not need to explain it in complex terms and mathematics, because the Big Bang event was fundamentally the simplest process you could imagine !! - the specific values 1) and then solution 2) are below !!
1) Here are some of my basics - Was the big bang probably caused by a division by zero, a mathematical oddity where 1 / 0 = infinity, a dividend of 1, with a divisor of zero equals a quotient of infinity, the smaller the divisor the bigger the quotient. The dividend of 1 is an infinitesimally small fundamental particle, and ok maybe not a divisor of zero, which some say is impossible, but a fraction of 1, an extremely small unimaginable value of say 10 to the minus googol, .01, not just the 1 zero but 100 zero's before the 1, (Q) So with a dividend of 1 that equals a whopping quotient of 1 x 10^101 / 10^70 = 10^31 x all the atoms in the Universe, ( The dividend of 1 is used to calculate the total number of atoms in the universe and the average mass 1.7 is used to give the total mass of the universe ), Obviously a divisor of 10 to the minus 70 would give a 1:1, our whole universe !!, , It really does not matter about the mass of the dividend, it can reduce as the divisor can to produce the same quotient in any situation, and can work in the opposite way. You can get a quotient of Atoms and Mass that equal 1 x 10^70 in 1000 different ways depending on how big the mass of the dividend is, with every different dividend mass there will be a divisor value that will produce the equivalent of 10^70, So the Big Bang could be any one of them, I have calculated the mass of the Universe to be the average mass 1.76 x 10^70, , incidentally you can get an 8 bit binary 00000000 that represents zero
2) As with most good solutions, mine is short, sweet and very simple !!, , ,So a huge immense and an unimaginable amount of material \ energy at one point from next to nothing, just one infinitesimally small fundamental particle for what ever reason appears on its own in the void, and then divided by it, it is obvious to me that a total void is by definition ZERO, , so - Boom - Big Bang !! and the secret to the Creation of the Universe - Let There Be Light !!.
haha, , , i bet even Einstein, one of my science heroes didn’t see that one !!
Don’t it just blow your mind and make your head hurt !! - Mick Bartram
Calculating The Average Atom Mass of The Universe !!
Phewwww, trying to work out the average, the total mass of all the atoms in the universe divided by the number of atoms, to give me the average mass of the Universe.
Approximately 73% of the mass of the visible universe is in the form of hydrogen. Helium makes up about 25% of the mass, and everything else represents only 2%., so i have guesstimated it to be (+ 2% (73 + 100)) / 100 = 1.76, the average mass is 1.76, so 1.76 x 10^70 that equals the mass of the Universe. . For my reference, 1.76 x 10^70 to 17.6 × 10^69 and both being the same quotient - where the dividend decimal point has been moved one place to the right, and the multiplier has one zero removed !!
I have done some research, and no one knows what caused or why the Big Bang came about, , it is an unknown !!
My conjecture may be a Multiple Discovery, but I have never seen anything like it that explains the Big Bang, and nothing online !!
haha , , My Hawking Dig = Did the Big Bang come about from an exploding singularity, don't think so !!, the Big Bang was just to immense and energetic to come from or be contained by a singularity, has anyone ever observed an exploding singularity, , NO !!
THIS IS ALL MY OWN WORK AND IDEA'S !! - Mick T Bartram
REMEMBER !!, , , all you need is a void and a particle to make a Universe !!
CORRECTION !!
Hmmmmm, , , Ages ago I noticed that the quotient 100 has one more zero than the divisor 0.01, SO!! 1 / 0.01 = 100 !!, , i have to incorporate that, it still applies to the vast values I am using, but i have now corrected it within 10^101
ha, , this is now going to get very Trippy !!
I have always been an atheist, but recently i now believe that something so simple and beautifully elegant had to be brought about by a creator !!, , , not a Christian or Islamic God, but a creator of my own idea and making !!, , , , haha, all thanks to the psychedelic Diphenidine it’s like DMT, 100% for real i was four times in his presence, a creator being and i was going to meet him, he led me on a journey, guiding me, it was so meaningful, and something big was going to happen, and it inspired me to make this post, ,it was so vivid and intricate with an overwhelming feeling of love, bliss and euphoria, and a cosmic orgasm, , lol, all four trips were very similar, , i wish i had some kind of recorder, because it was utterly amazing !!, I am 100% for sure, certain that I was in the presence of a creator being, it was undeniable !!, ,that was six years ago, but it is now like a dream you can’t quite remember
Scientists now believe that before you die, the brain releases trippy chemicals, Like David Labraccio says in FLATLINERS "I don't know, maybe there's some chemical or a hormone released from the brain at the time of death", I think the Diphenidine I took was similar to one of these, allowing you to meet your creator, , haha, , sounds like something straight out of the Twilight Zone, but it’s a great thought !!
When my mother died on Wednesday 30th June 2021 aged 85, it gave me great comfort to think of this
PS.
Is the constant flow of the present different to the speed of light being constant ?
I had this thought five years ago - The 2 are no different !!, they both travel at the speed of light, and have the same effect
1) The speed of light is constant to all observers, and in the same way the rate at which the present flows is constant
2) Time travels at the speed of light, so when I see you move faster and faster relative to me, i see you start to catch up with time and that makes your clock run slower than mine, we shall not agree upon the rate of flow of time, but for both of us the flow of the present is constant and passes at the same rate, , ,
The way time behaves is academic, and explained in Einsteins "Special Theory of Relativity", but we do not know what causes time on a fundamental level, and many physicists believe just that, that it is a fundamental aspect of nature. But the cause of Time has such an extreme inability for comprehension and is so abstract, that it is one of the biggest unknowns, like why is there a Past - Present - Future, and what makes the continuous fleeting moment of the present flow to the future creating the past. Just like the cause of the Big Bang, this puzzle must be very simple, , we know how time behaves, but that's all, , , We need another Einstein to come along with a breakthrough, , ,
And as Einstein said = Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.
I like to think of the simplistic idea’s and explanations, , and maybe the constant flow of the present is some kind of lag from time traveling at the speed of light, also the past and the future are either side of the present and must have an effect that could push and pull it like being on the crest of a wave ?
